Home » Blog » Categories »

N4063: On Parallel Invocations of Functions in Parallelism TS -- Artur Laksberg

By Blog Staff | Jul 3, 2014 05:24 PM | Tags: None

This paper was approved at the June ISO C++ meeting.

A new WG21 paper is available. A copy is linked below, and the paper will also appear in the next normal WG21 mailing. If you are not a committee member, please use the comments section below or the std-proposals forum for public discussion.

Document number: N4063

Date: 2014-06-20

On Parallel Invocations of Functions in Parallelism TS

by Artur Laksberg

Excerpt:

At the Issaquah meeting in February 2014, Hans Boehm raised the following issue regarding N3850 (Working Draft, Technical Specification for C++ Extensions for Parallelism):

It seems to me that the execution policies need to be a bit more precise about which calls to parameter functions they can make. Something needs to specify that sort may make parallel invocations to swap, but only if the arguments for concurrent calls don’t overlap. I didn’t quickly find such text. In general, “non-racing” calls can be made concurrently, but “racing” ones cannot.

Upon further discussion, it was decided that the resolution of this issue warrants a separate paper that can be presented for discussion in SG1 during the Rapperswil meeting.

...

This paper supersedes N3993. The discussion in Rapperswil illuminated the need for additional changes to describe the difference between read-only and mutating functons. ...

N4071: Working Draft, Technical Specification for C++ Extensions for Parallelism -- Jared Hoberock

By Blog Staff | Jul 3, 2014 05:22 PM | Tags: None

A new WG21 paper is available. A copy is linked below, and the paper will also appear in the next normal WG21 mailing. If you are not a committee member, please use the comments section below or the std-proposals forum for public discussion.

Document number: N4071

Date: 2014-06-19

Working Draft, Technical Specification for C++ Extensions for Parallelism

by Jared Hoberock

N4070: Improving the specification of the vector execution policy in Parallelism TS -- Hans-J. Boehm

By Blog Staff | Jul 3, 2014 05:17 PM | Tags: None

This paper was approved at the June ISO C++ meeting.

A new WG21 paper is available. A copy is linked below, and the paper will also appear in the next normal WG21 mailing. If you are not a committee member, please use the comments section below or the std-proposals forum for public discussion.

Document number: N4070

Date: 2014-06-20

Improving the specification of the vector execution policy in Parallelism TS

by Hans-J. Boehm

Excerpt:

The Parallelism TS currently prohibits synchronization in functions called from vector algorithms, but says nothing about which standard library functions may invoke synchronization. Unfortunately, due to inline expansion, and the possibility of compiling nested functions in vector mode even if not inlined, this also applies to nested internal synchronization.

This is a very rough initial attempt at somewhat pinning this down. I expect this to generate PDTS comments. The reason to apply a rough fix now is to point out the issue, and hopefully generate much more relevant comments sooner rather than later.

N4077: Experimental shared_ptr for Library Fundamentals TS -- Jonathan Wakely

By Blog Staff | Jul 3, 2014 05:15 PM | Tags: None

This paper was approved at the June ISO C++ meeting for the Library Fundamentals TS.

A new WG21 paper is available. A copy is linked below, and the paper will also appear in the next normal WG21 mailing. If you are not a committee member, please use the comments section below or the std-proposals forum for public discussion.

Document number: N4077

Date: 2014-06-20

Experimental shared_ptr for Library Fundamentals TS

by Jonathan Wakely

Excerpt:

This paper provides wording to the effect that it creates independent fundamental-ts types in namespace std::experimental for shared_ptr, weak_ptr, owner_less, enable_shared_from_this, and all relevant functions and hash specializations.

N4067: Experimental std::function etc. -- Daniel Krügler

By Blog Staff | Jul 3, 2014 05:12 PM | Tags: None

This paper was approved at the June ISO C++ meeting for the Library Fundamentals TS.

A new WG21 paper is available. A copy is linked below, and the paper will also appear in the next normal WG21 mailing. If you are not a committee member, please use the comments section below or the std-proposals forum for public discussion.

Document number: N4067

Date: 2014-06-20

Experimental std::function etc.

by Daniel Krügler

Excerpt:

This paper provides wording to the effect that it creates independent fundamental-ts types in namespace std::experimental for function, promise, and packaged_task.

N4076: A proposal to add a generalized callable negator (Revision 4) -- Tomasz Kaminski

By Blog Staff | Jul 3, 2014 05:07 PM | Tags: None

This paper was approved at the June ISO C++ meeting for the Library Fundamentals TS.

A new WG21 paper is available. A copy is linked below, and the paper will also appear in the next normal WG21 mailing. If you are not a committee member, please use the comments section below or the std-proposals forum for public discussion.

Document number: N4076

Date: 2014-06-17

A proposal to add a generalized callable negator (Revision 4)

by Tomasz Kaminski

Excerpt:

This proposal is to add function template not_fn that will allow to create negator of any callable object.

N4059: Spring 2015 C++ Standards Committee Meeting -- Michael Price

By Blog Staff | Jul 3, 2014 01:01 PM | Tags: None

A new WG21 paper is available. A copy is linked below, and the paper will also appear in the next normal WG21 mailing. If you are not a committee member, please use the comments section below or the std-proposals forum for public discussion.

Document number: N4059

Date: 2014-07-03

Spring 2015 C++ Standards Committee Meeting

by Michael Price

Excerpt:

Perceptive Software is pleased to host the Spring 2015 C++ Standards Committee Meeting on May 4-9, 2015.

Meeting location

Perceptive Software World Headquarters
8900 Renner Blvd.
Lenexa, Kan. 66219

(Located within the Kansas City metropolitan area)

N4073: A Proposal to Add 2D Graphics Rendering and Display to C++, Rev 2 -- McLaughlin, Sutter, Zink

By Blog Staff | Jul 3, 2014 12:04 PM | Tags: None

A new WG21 paper is available. A copy is linked below, and the paper will also appear in the next normal WG21 mailing. If you are not a committee member, please use the comments section below or the std-proposals forum for public discussion.

Document number: N4073

Date: 2014-07-03

A Proposal to Add 2D Graphics Rendering and Display to C++, Revision 2

by Michael B. McLaughlin, Herb Sutter, Jason Zink

Excerpt:

The goal of this proposal is to define a 2D drawing API for the C++ programming language. This proposal is a revision of N4021. It resolves some defects in that document and adds several features which were intended for N4021 but were not completed in time. It was presented in draft form to SG13 at the Rapperswil meeting in June 2014. Based on the consensus feedback received at the meeting, a full Technical Specifications section written in the language, style, and format of the ISO/IEC C++ Standard will be included in the next revision of this proposal.

N4116: Nested Namespace Definition (rev 1) -- Andrew Tomazos and Robert Kawulak

By Blog Staff | Jul 3, 2014 08:40 AM | Tags: None

A new WG21 paper is available. A copy is linked below, and the paper will also appear in the next normal WG21 mailing. If you are not a committee member, please use the comments section below or the std-proposals forum for public discussion.

Document number: N4116

Date: 2014-07-02

Nested Namespace Definition (rev 1)

by Andrew Tomazos and Robert Kawulak

Excerpt:

EWG did meet and discuss N4026 in Rapperswil, including each of the open issues. Several
different votes were taken. By far the strongest consensus was for just the basic facility with no
attributes, no aliases and no inline:

SF: 11 F: 5 N: 3 A: 0 SA: 0

Furthermore, if it is implemented in this configuration, these extra features can always be added
later by a separate proposal.

We therefore formally propose that the following wording corresponding to the “basic facility” be
added to the working draft: ...