Meeting C++ 2013

By Meeting C++ | Nov 14, 2013 07:16 AM | Tags: intermediate conferences concurrency community c++14 c++11 boost basics advanced

The recent Meeting C++ 2013 was a blast, the 2nd Meeting C++ conference was with over 200 guests a full success!

Meeting C++ 2013

by Jens Weller

Additional Online Resources:

Stephen Kelly about CMake for Qt and Boost

The talks from Peter Sommerlad

Sven Johannsens HTML based talk about STL11 is online.

Available slides are linked in the talk descriptions.

Learn How To Program... with C++ -- Kate Gregory

By Blog Staff | Nov 8, 2013 12:47 AM | Tags: basics

Do you know a beginner who'd like to learn C++? Or even just learn how to program... using C++?

Recently, C++ author and trainer Kate Gregory made a new 7-hour course available via Pluralsight. And not just any introductory course, but teaching C++ the way it should be taught... not "C and pointers first."

It's highly-rated, as with all of Kate's courses. Know about it and recommend it to newcomers.

Learn How to Program with C++

Instructor: Kate Gregory

If you've never programmed before, and you think you'd like to learn C++, why not learn it first? This course covers what you need to start writing real applications in C++.

Why does C++ not allow multiple types in one auto statement? -- StackOverflow

By Blog Staff | Nov 7, 2013 12:20 PM | Tags: basics

Recently on SO:

Why does C++ not allow multiple types in one auto statement?

The 2011 C++ standard introduced the new keyword auto, which can be used for defining variables instead of a type, i.e.

auto p=make_pair(1,2.5);                   // pair<int,double>
auto i=std::begin(c), end=std::end(c);     // decltype(std::begin(c))

In the second line, i and end are of the same type, referred to as auto. The standard does not allow

auto i=std::begin(container), e=std::end(container), x=*i;

when x would be of different type. My question: why does the standard not allow this last line? ...

C++ User Group Meetings November

By Meeting C++ | Nov 2, 2013 04:58 PM | Tags: intermediate community basics

An overview of C++ User Groups which meet in November:

C++ User Group Meetings in November

by Jens Weller

From the Article:

November has come, Meeting C++ Conference is soon...
... and also 12 C++ User Groups are meeting...

Compiling and Linking in C++ -- Rusty Ocean

By Blog Staff | Nov 1, 2013 03:01 PM | Tags: basics

Life'n'gadget just published a nice overview of the basic C++ compilation model, useful for people who are new to programming in C++.

Compiling and Linking in C++

by Rusty Ocean

From the article:

When you write a C++ program, the next step is to compile the program before running it. The compilation is the process which convert the program written in human readable language like C, C++ etc into a machine code, directly understood by the Central Processing Unit. There are many stages involved in creating a executable file from the source file. The stages include Preprocessing, Compiling and Linking in C++...

Quick Q: Is 'auto' type deduction static (compile time) or dynamic (run time)?

By Blog Staff | Oct 29, 2013 01:56 PM | Tags: basics

Recently on StackOverflow:

C++ 11 auto compile time or runtime?

auto a = 10;

When compiler knows a is int, at compile time or at run-time? If it deduce type at run-time, will it not affect performance?

No Runtime Overhead -- Bulldozer00

By Blog Staff | Oct 16, 2013 07:24 AM | Tags: basics

A little nugget about the free-as-in-no-overhead-ness of unique_ptr and std::move:

No Runtime Overhead

by Bulldozer00

From the article:

Unless I really need shared ownership of a dynamically allocated object, which I haven’t so far, I stick to the slimmer and more performant std::unique_ptr. ...

What are the semantics of =delete? -- StackOverflow

By Blog Staff | Oct 9, 2013 11:15 AM | Tags: basics

The question, rephrased: Does =delete mean "make the compiler skip this function and keep looking," or "make this function unusable and make the caller fix their code" -- and why?

What's the exact semantics of a deleted function in C++11?

struct A
{
    A();

    A(const A&);
    A& operator =(const A&);

    A(A&&) = delete;
    A& operator =(A&&) = delete;
};

struct B
{
    B();

    B(const B&);
    B& operator =(const B&);   
};

int main()
{
    A a;
    a = A(); // error C2280

    B b;
    b = B(); // OK
}

My compiler is VC++ 2013 RC.

error C2280: 'A &A::operator =(A &&)' : attempting to reference a deleted function

I just wonder why the compiler doesn't try A& operator =(const A&); when A& operator =(A&&) is deleted?

Is this behavior defined by the C++ standard?

Papers for Chicago: Concurrency

By Meeting C++ | Sep 14, 2013 04:08 AM | Tags: standardization performance intermediate experimental efficiency concurrency c++14 basics advanced

The start of my series about the papers for the upcoming Chicago meeting, starting with C for Concurrency:

C++ Papers for Chicago: Part 1 -- Concurrency

by Jens Weller

From the article:

As I did write a series about the papers for Bristol, this is the start of the series for Chicago, as at the end of this month the C++ committee will meet again for standardization. I try to...

C++ Conferences This Fall

By Meeting C++ | Sep 1, 2013 12:57 PM | Tags: community basics advanced

I've created a short overview over the C++ Conferences this Fall:

• Going Native (Seattle, 4.th-6.9) SOLD OUT
• International Workshop on OpenMP (Canberra (AU), 16-18.9)
• (not a conference, but...) Fall ISO C++ meeting (Chicago, 23-28.9)
• QtDevDays Europe (Berlin, 7th - 9.10)
• QtDevDays US (San Francisco, 6th-8.11)
• Meeting C++ 2013 (Düsseldorf, 8th-9.11)
• C++ and Beyond (Snoqualmie Falls (WA/US), 9th-12.12) SOLD OUT

More details at Meeting C++

by Jens Weller