Using STL Vectors, and Efficient Vectors of Vectors -- Thomas Young

By Blog Staff | Dec 6, 2013 12:36 PM | Tags: intermediate basics

These are also the first two articles in a new blog by the creator of the PathEngine SDK.

Note: One or two of the points can be controversial, but the content is interesting and informative especially as an experience report.

Using STL Vectors

Efficient Vectors of Vectors

by Thomas Young

From the articles:

The stuff we do with vectors can be broadly categorised into two main use cases:

• the construction of (potentially complex) preprocess objects, and
• run-time buffers for queries, where buffer size requirements are fundamentally dynamic in nature

Preprocess objects include things like the pathfinding visibility graph. These objects can take time to build, but this is something that can be done by the game content pipeline, with preprocess data saved and loaded back from persistence by the game runtime.

Say hello to wxWidgets3.0

By Meeting C++ | Dec 4, 2013 10:53 AM | Tags: wxwidgets intermediate c++11 basics

A few weeks ago wxWidgets3.0 was released, now it's time to take a look at it:

Say hello to wxWidgets3.0

From the Article

I remember the times, when wxWidgets 3.0 was already talked about, several years ago. Now, its been published in November, though I have to take a look at it. I've been using wxWidgets for years, but moved on to Qt for my own projects. So, lets have a look at wxWidgets 3.0...

Quick Q: Why have move semantics? -- StackOverflow

By Blog Staff | Dec 3, 2013 04:42 AM | Tags: basics

Quick A: Because value semantics are clean and naturally (exception-)safe, and avoid the brittleness of pre-C++11 workarounds that resort to owning raw pointers.

As often happens, the question contains the answer...

Why have move semantics?

... Can't the client already take advantage of pointers to do everything move semantics gives us? If so, then what is the purpose of move semantics?

Move semantics:

std::string f()
{
    std::string s("some long string");
    return s;
}

int main()
{
    // super-fast pointer swap!
    std::string a = f();
    return 0;
}

Pointers:

std::string *f()
{
    std::string *s = new std::string("some long string");
    return s;
}

int main()
{
    // still super-fast pointer swap!
    std::string *a = f();
    delete a;
    return 0;
}

Dive into C++11 (#2) -- Frametime/FPS, constexpr, uniform initialization, and more

By Vittorio Romeo | Dec 3, 2013 03:59 AM | Tags: intermediate basics

Hello again, I’m Vittorio Romeo, a computer science student, hobbyist game developer and C++ enthusiast.

I've uploaded the second episode of "Dive into C++11" on my YouTube channel. You can find the first episode here.

You can find the complete playlist here.

In this episode we will learn more about two previously mentioned new awesome C++11 features: "constexpr" and "uniform initialization syntax".

Most importantly, we will also deal with a very big issue that every game developer must face: FPS/frametime, and how to avoid the game from behaving differently on slower/faster machines.

In addition, we'll also briefly learn about "const-correctness" and using the "noexcept" keyword.

We will analyze the "time-slice" method to allow the game to run smoothly and consistently on every machine.

In the last code segment, we will also "refactor" our code by creating a `Game` class, making our source much easier to read and maintain.

I greatly appreciate comments and criticism, and ideas for future videos/tutorials.

Feel free to fork the game's source code at: https://github.com/SuperV1234/Tutorials

Quick Q: Why write "5 == myValue" instead of "myvalue == 5"? -- StackOverflow

By Blog Staff | Nov 26, 2013 03:31 PM | Tags: basics

Quick A: Because it catches most cases where you accidentally wrote = instead of ==.

From SO:

Reason for using '5 == myValue' in conditionals

I've come across some code that flips how a condition is checked and was wondering why this would be done aside from a weird personal quirk. I've never seen any text books use it nor have I seen any sample code done this way.

// why do it this way?
if (5 == myValue)
{
    // do something
}

// instead of:
if (myValue == 5)
{
    // do something
}

I've only seen this way for == operand but not for any other operands.

Moves Demystified -- Alexander Kondratskiy

By Alexander Kondratskiy | Nov 26, 2013 10:17 AM | Tags: intermediate basics

This article aims to dispel some confusion about move semantics.

Moves Demystified

by Alexander Kondratskiy

From the article:

We’ll start with why moves are needed in the first place, then see how to use them, and eventually move onto common misconceptions and pitfalls.

Continue reading…

Dive into C++11 -- Arkanoid clone in 160 lines of code (SFML2)

By Vittorio Romeo | Nov 25, 2013 11:00 AM | Tags: sfml basics

I'm Vittorio Romeo, a computer science student, hobbyist game developer and C++ enthusiast.

I've created a 40 minute tutorial/screencast on the creation of a complete game using C++11 and SFML2. The end result is a playable Arkanoid/Breakout clone with a paddle, a ball and destroyable bricks.

I divided the code in 9 segments, that I analyze and execute individually.

The point of the video is showing how easy it is to create something playable thanks to the C++11 standard, and to show a possible train of thought that can be taken during game development.

I greatly appreciate comments and criticism, and ideas for future videos/tutorials.

Also, feel free to fork the game's source code here: https://github.com/SuperV1234/Tutorials

If the idea catches on, I'd love to make a video featuring the best forks.

Thanks for watching!

Basic Structure of C++ Program -- Prashant Sharma

By prashant0788 | Nov 22, 2013 12:44 PM | Tags: basics

[Ed.: This is a simple short "hello world" overview for someone starting to program in C++, and is basically correct. There are lots of expert-friendly articles, but we like and want to encourage the beginner- and intermediate-level articles as well for the benefit of the many recent newcomers to the language.]

Basic Structure of C++ Program

The easiest way to understand the basic structure of C++ program is by writing a program. The basic C++ program is as follows: ...

Stroustrup & Sutter on C++: Mar 31 - Apr 1, San Jose, CA, USA

By Blog Staff | Nov 20, 2013 02:21 PM | Tags: intermediate basics advanced

For the first time in several years, Bjarne Stroustrup and Herb Sutter will hold a two-day seminar on C++

Super C++ Tutorial: Stroustrup & Sutter on C++

EE Live!
March 31 - April 3, 2014
San Jose, CA, USA

Are you a serious C++ developer? The two-day Super C++ Tutorial, taught by Herb Sutter and Bjarne Stroustrup, the creator of C++, is designed for active C++ developers, embedded systems developers, and anybody who works with the language on a regular basis and wants to write faster, more efficient code for applications ranging from data centers to mobile platforms where all-day battery life is key.

We invite you to spend two insightful and informative days as the instructors present the most important things C++ developers need to know in 2014. The two days are designed to cover a balanced curriculum of information: useful for C++ developers at any level, with helpful information whether you’ve only used C++ for a year or two or are a top C++ guru; balanced between language and standard library topics; covering today’s modern techniques and best practices together with forward-looking information about new features coming and expected to be broadly available in the next year; panels where both speakers share their insights and perspectives with each other and answer your questions; and much more, with the deep context and expertise that these instructors uniquely bring.

Quick Q: Why is there a nonmember begin(), but no nonmember cbegin()? -- StackOverflow

By Blog Staff | Nov 19, 2013 08:22 AM | Tags: basics

Quick A: There is, in C++14.

From SO:

Is there a way to use standalone std::begin and for a const_iterator?

I like consistency. I recently asked the question of using std::begin vs. e.g. std::vector<int>::begin, and the unanimous decision seemed to be to use the former since it is more general. But I think I found a stick in the mud. Sometimes, you want to convey you will not change a container as you loop through it, hence calling std::vector<int>::cbegin. It would make your code quite asymmetric if you sometimes did iter = v.cbegin() and other times did iter = begin(v). Is there a way around this lack of symmetry, and would you still recommend std::begin given this knowledge? Why does C++ not have std::cbegin?