March 18-23, Tokyo, Japan
April 17-20, Bristol, UK
April 24-26, Leganes, Spain
April 30, Online
May 7-12, Aspen, CO, USA
June 24-29, St. Louis, MO, USA
July 2-5, Folkestone, Kent, UK
By Adrien Hamelin | May 4, 2015 08:02 AM | Tags: c++14 basics
Binary literals and digit separators
by Marius Bancila
From the article:
The C++14 standard provides two new small features to the language: binary literals and digit separators. They are already available in Clang 3.4 and GCC 4.9 and now Visual Studio 2015 RC has implemented them. They may not be something you can’t leave without, but sometimes it’s convenient to have them. Let’s have a look...
By Adrien Hamelin | May 4, 2015 08:00 AM | Tags: intermediate community
An interesting post on interesting librairies:
5 awesome C++ libraries we use
by Edouard
From the article:
This is an opinionated post about five libraries we use in the production code of quasardb.
We of course use many more great libraries (for example Boost.ASIO which is not listed here). Maybe those five libraries are not the most important, but I felt they deserved some special highlight as they are not so well-known or understood...
By Adrien Hamelin | May 4, 2015 07:59 AM | Tags: performance efficiency
While we wait for CppCon 2015 in September, we’re featuring videos of some of the 100+ talks from CppCon 2014. Here is today’s feature:
Lock-Free Programming (or, Juggling Razor Blades), Part II
by Herb Sutter
Summary of the talk:
Example-driven talk on how to design and write lock-free algorithms and data structures using C++ atomic -- something that can look deceptively simple, but contains very deep topics. (Important note: This is not the same as my "atomic Weapons" talk; that talk was about the "what they are and why" of the C++ memory model and atomics, and did not cover how to actually use atomics to implement highly concurrent algorithms and data structures.)
By Meeting C++ | May 4, 2015 03:54 AM | Tags: community
The monthly overview on the current user group meetings:
C++ User Group Meetings in May
by Jens Weller
From the article:
6.5 C++ UG Saint Louis - DD Part 5 - "Atomic" weapons OR ??
6.5 C++ UG Munich - What is new in VS2015 for C++ Developers
6.5 C++ UG Saint Louis - "Atomic weapons" part II
6.5 C++ UG Austin - Charming Python with C++
7.5 C++ UG NRW/Aachen - C++ User Gruppe (Mai)
7.5 C++ UG Dresden - Coding Dojo
11.5 C++ UG Zentralschweiz - Compile-time computation in C++14" mit Prof. Peter Sommerlad
13.5 C++ UG Utah - Test-Driven Development in C++
13.5 C++ UG San Francisco/ Bay area - Presentation and Q&A
15.5 C++ UG Taipei - monthly meetup
16.5 C++ UG Pune, India - Mastering C++14
18.5 C++ UG Austin - North Austin Monthly C/C++ Pub Social
20.5 C++ UG Düsseldorf - Cooking with C++
20.5 C++ UG Arhus - Kickoff Meeting
20.5 C++ UG Northwest/Seattle - STL Concepts and Ranges
21.5 C++ UG Bristol - Lightning Talks
27.5 C++ UG San Francisco/ Bay area - Workshop and Discussion Group
27.5 C++ UG Hamburg - C++ Expression Templates
27.5 C++ UG Udine (Italy)
28.5 C++ UG Rhein-Neckar - (C++) build system olympics.
By Blog Staff | May 2, 2015 03:50 PM | Tags: None
New WG21 papers are available. If you are not a committee member, please use the comments section below or the std-proposals forum for public discussion.
Document number: N4494
Date: 2015-05-01
Multidimensional bounds, offset and array_view, revision 6
by Łukasz Mendakiewicz and Herb Sutter
Excerpt:
Revision 6 (N4494) incorporates the changes requested by LWG in Cologne meeting, marked as deletions and insertions.
The following suggestions were implemented fully:
The following suggestion was implemented partially:
- Rephrased coord.general avoid references to mathematical entites.
- Renamed index to offset.
- Changed int Rank template parameter to size_t Rank throughout the document.
- Made offset, bounds and bounds_iterator binary operators (apart from @= forms) free functions.
- Replaced term "component" with "element" when referring to the individual constituents of offset or bounds.
- In coord.bounds.require replaced prose with an equivalent mathematical expression.
- In coord.bounds.iterator and coord.bounds.iterator.require removed the requirement on bounds_iterator to represent a random access iterator, replacing with "as-if" phrasing.
- In the description of bounds_iterator& operator++() replaced the code snippet with equivalent prose.
- In views.general changed the font back to non-monospace.
- Removed views.require, duplicating it as arrayview.require and stridedarrayview.require.
- Removed redundant assignment operators on array_view and strided_array_view.
- Employed "exposition only" data members is the descriptions of array_view and strided_array_view semantics.
- Rephrased the first paragraph in arrayview.cons to avoid ambiguity in binding of the token "type".
- In constexpr array_view(Viewable&& vw) rephrased the third bullet point.
- Instead of the array_view(ArrayType& arr) constructor being completely removed, it has been constrained to 1-D case as the Committee indicated that such case does not exhibit the undefined behavior. We believe that the request to remove it completely was a misstatment.
The following suggestion was not implemented:
- The semantics of the proposed types were not extended to allow rank-0 cases. We feel that we lack sufficient practical experience in using such cases and we are afraid of some contention points when it comes to defining their detailed semantics. We observe that such an extension can be introduced in future without conflicting with the proposal in the current form.
By Blog Staff | May 2, 2015 09:55 AM | Tags: None
Also announced this week:
Bringing Clang to Windows
by Raman Sharma
From the article:
What if you could use a single compiler for your cross-platform code irrespective of what platform you target? ...
This is now possible with the work we have done. What this enables is a scenario in which you compile ... (2) using Clang and ... the Visual C++ back-end (We call it C2). All of this while still enjoying the rich end-to-end developer experience within Visual Studio.
By Blog Staff | May 2, 2015 09:39 AM | Tags: None
C++ conformance updates for Visual C++:
C++11/14/17 Features In VS 2015 RC
by Stephan T. Lavavej
From the article:
Visual Studio 2015 RC is now available, so it's time for updated feature tables...
By Adrien Hamelin | May 1, 2015 07:59 AM | Tags: performance efficiency
While we wait for CppCon 2015 in September, we’re featuring videos of some of the 100+ talks from CppCon 2014. Here is today’s feature:
Lock-Free Programming (or, Juggling Razor Blades), Part I
by Herb Sutter
Summary of the talk:
Example-driven talk on how to design and write lock-free algorithms and data structures using C++ atomic -- something that can look deceptively simple, but contains very deep topics. (Important note: This is not the same as my "atomic Weapons" talk; that talk was about the "what they are and why" of the C++ memory model and atomics, and did not cover how to actually use atomics to implement highly concurrent algorithms and data structures.)
By Blog Staff | Apr 30, 2015 08:49 PM | Tags: None
Yesterday, Bjarne Stroustrup posted a draft note of his thoughts about the next C++ standard currently expect in 2017. In the following interview, Stroustrup answers further questions about his note:
Stroustrup: Thoughts on C++17 -- An Interview
by Sergio De Simone, InfoQ
From the article:
... Look inside most critical systems and gadgets and you’ll find some C++ inside. That, and being able to help science in a small way, through its software systems, motivates me. C++ is a tool meant to be used for building important artifacts.