Articles & Books

Quick Q: Does make_shared avoid an extra allocation for the reference counts? -- StackOverflow

A: Yes, make_shared is your friend!

Recently on SO:

What happens when using make_shared

I'm interested if these two lines of code are the same:

shared_ptr<int> sp(new int(1)); // double allocation?
shared_ptr<int> sp(make_shared<int>(1)); // just one allocation?

If this is true could someone please explain why is it only one allocation in the second line?

Overload 122 is available

overload-122.PNGOverload 122 is now available. It contains the following C++-related articles, and more:

 

Overload 122

Musings on Python -- By a C++ Developer

Python and C++ are very different languages. Sergey Ignatchenko walks through things in Python that can confuse a C++ programmer

Activatable Object

Using locks will slow down threaded code. Len Holgate demonstrates how an Activatable Object can reduce the time spent blocked.

HTTP and HTTPS in Qt

How to handle HTTP and HTTPs requests in Qt

HTTP and HTTPs in Qt

by Jens Weller

From the article:

Last week I started to work on an old project again: My own feed reader. I found the code 2 weeks a go on an old USB Stick, and decided to refactor it into a useful state. This involved dealing with HTTP via QNetworkAccessManager.

C++ User Group Meetings in August

Again, the overview about the upcoming user group meetings for the new month. As it is August, there are not as much meetings due to summer.

C++ User Group Meetings in August 2014

by Jens Weller

From the article:

6.8. C++ UG Austin - Pragmatic Type Erasure
13.8 C++ UG Bay area/San Francisco
14.8 C++ UG Dresden - Compile Time Sort"
14.8 C++ UG NRW/Aachen - Various talks
19.8 C++ UG Berlin - Experience with C++11 in ArangoDB
20.8 C++ UG NRW/Düsseldorf - Wartungtechniken
28.8 C++ UG Amsterdam - Event Driven Design in C++11

AST matchers and Clang refactoring tools -- Eli Bendersky

You can do some great things when you have a reusable open-source C++ parser:

AST matchers and Clang refactoring tools

by Eli Bendersky

From the article:

Clang tooling sees lots of interest and development focus in the past few years. At last, we have a convenient, accurate, open-source and well supported framework for programmatically analyzing and refactoring C++ code; I find this very exciting.

A great outcome of this rapid pace of development is that new APIs and tools spring up all the time. For example, some time ago the Clang tooling developers figured out folks doing AST traversals have to write a lot of repetitive code to find interesting AST nodes, so they came up with a great new API called AST matchers, which I want to discuss here...

Quick Q: Why doesn't std::sort accept its comparator by reference? -- StackOverflow

Quick A: By design, because function objects are expected to be nonstateful values.

Recently on SO:

Why doesn't std::sort accept comparator by reference?

The standard on std::reference_wrapper explains that std::sort now accepts std::reference_wrapper, allowing one to pass a comparator by reference.

Is there a reason std::sort didn't accept the comparator by reference in the first place?

A Clang edition of the C++11/14 Rocks book is now available

Korban's C++11/14 feature overview book now has a Clang edition, in addition to VS2013 and GCC:

Clang Edition of the C++11/14 Rocks Book

by Alex Korban

From the announcement:

Do you use Clang to compile C++? Would you like to know all about the C++11 and C++14 language features it supports?

You can read about them in the new edition of my C++11/14 Rocks book tailored to Clang.

...

For those who have the GCC edition of the book: you’ll already be familiar with all the C++11 content as GCC also has full C++11 support. However, the Clang edition has full C++14 coverage instead of an overview.

A video interview with Michael Wong

At C++Now this and last year I recorded a short interview with Michael Wong:

A video interview with Michael Wong

The interview as a youtube playlist

by Jens Weller

From the Article:

I've started last year a video interview in Aspen - while at C++Now - with Michael Wong. This year I had the chance to finish the interview and I am now finally able to release it. Michael is a member of the C++ Committee for many years, he leads the Canadian delegation and also speaks for IBM at the C++ committee.