The Day I Fell in Love with Fuzzing—Chris Wellons

Do you know about it?

The Day I Fell in Love with Fuzzing

by Chris Wellons

From the article:

In 2007 I wrote a pair of modding tools, binitools, for a space trading and combat simulation game named Freelancer. The game stores its non-art assets in the format of “binary INI” files, or “BINI” files. The motivation for the binary format over traditional INI files was probably performance: it’s faster to load and read these files than it is to parse arbitrary text in INI format...

How to Emulate the Spaceship Operator Before C++20 with CRTP—Henrik Sjöström

To wait until the real thing.

How to Emulate the Spaceship Operator Before C++20 with CRTP

by Henrik Sjöström

From the article:

Making a class comparable is usually something of a chore. In C++20 we’ll get the “three-way comparison operator” or informally spaceship operator <=>. It will allow the compiler to create comparison operators when we want a simple lexicographical comparison and when we have a more complex comparison we only need to implement a single operator to be able to do all comparisons...

Quick Q: C++ template typedef

Quick A: Use the normal template declaration.

Recently on SO:

C++ template typedef

C++11 added alias declarations, which are generalization of typedef, allowing templates:

template <size_t N>
using Vector = Matrix<N, 1>;

The type Vector<3> is equivalent to Matrix<3, 1>.

Quick Q: Compile-time loop optimisation

Quick A: each release of C++ allows more things to be done at compile time.

Recently on SO:

Compile-time loop optimisation

In C++14, constexpr function requirements were relaxed.

Previously, in C++11, constexpr functions could only contain typedefs, static_asserts and usings, but only a single return statement.

In C++14, it became possible to use loops in constexpr function bodies.

Because b was declared as constexpr char, it must be evaluated at compile time. The compiler then optimised out the isStringNice function, as it is not used at run time.

C++ Insights - Implicit Conversions—Andreas Fertig

A good tool!

C++ Insights - Implicit Conversions

by Andreas Fertig

From the article:

This series is motivated by a brief conversation I had with Andreas. I asked him if he has some use case examples which show how C++ Insights can be helpful when teaching. I think there are many things. This article is the start of a series of five posts by Andreas which I will publish at Modernes C++ because I think C++ Insights is an invaluable tool to get a deeper insight in the C++ compiler magic. In case, you are new to C++ Insights consider this introductory article. Without further ado, Andreas post. When you follow the link near to each example, you can directly analyse the example in C++ Insight...

Quick Q: Deletion of copy-ctor & copy-assignment - public, private or protected?

Quick A: The meaning is the same for the compiler, so chooses what make sense to you.

Recently on SO:

Deletion of copy-ctor & copy-assignment - public, private or protected?

I would put them in the public section.

This is because deleting a constructor or an assignment operator is orthogonal to making them private / protected; and when these aren't deleted, they are public. Putting the deletions in one of those two sections seems to me like hinting "If I hadn't deleted them, I would have made them private/protected" - which is not a message you want to convey in your case.

Note, though, that the compiler doesn't care which section you put the deletion in.