Home » Blog » Tags » intermediate

intermediate

C++ String to Int -- Ivan Neeson

By Meeting C++ | Aug 16, 2013 08:53 AM | Tags: performance intermediate efficiency

kumobius.PNGA nice comparison on converting a string to int:

C++ String to Int

by Ivan Neeson

From the article:

In this post I will compare the following methods for parsing a string into an integer in C++:

  • Manually
  • atoi()
  • strtol()
  • sscanf()
  • std::stoi (C++11 only)
  • std::istringstream
  • Boost.LexicalCast
  • Boost.LexicalCast with C locale
  • Boost.Spirit.Qi
  • Boost.Coerce

But first lets look at the requirements...

Overload 116 available

By Blog Staff | Aug 15, 2013 11:18 PM | Tags: intermediate basics advanced

overload-116.PNGOverload 116 is now available. It contains the following articles, and more:

 

Overload 116

Auto -- A Necessary Evil? Part 2 -- Roger Orr

When is the use of auto good, and when is it evil?

Dynamic C++, Part 2 -- Alex Fabijanic

Alex Fabijanic and Richard Saunders continue to explore dynamic solutions in C++.

Portable String Literals in C++ -- Alf Steinbach

How hard can it be to make a file in C++ with international text literals in its name? Alf Steinbach shows us how to write a file called π.recipe.

Hard Upper Limit on Memory Latency -- Sergey Ignatchenko

How low can latency really get?

 

... and more!

GotW #94 Solution: AAA Style (Almost Always Auto) -- Herb Sutter

By Blog Staff | Aug 14, 2013 04:53 PM | Tags: intermediate basics

The solution to the latest GotW problem is now available:

GotW #94 Solution: AAA Style (Almost Always Auto)

by Herb Sutter

From the article:

4. When declaring a new local variable x, what advantages are there to declaring it using auto and one of the two following syntaxes:

(a) auto x = init; when you don’t need to commit to a specific type? (Note: The expression init might include calling a helper that performs partial type adjustment, such as as_signed, while still not committing to a specific type.)

(b) auto x = type{ init }; when you do want to commit to a specific type by naming a type?

Quick Q: Why do I have to write 'mutable' on a lambda? -- StackOverflow

By Blog Staff | Aug 5, 2013 11:04 AM | Tags: intermediate

Inquiring minds want to know:

Why does C++0x's lambda require “mutable” keyword for capture-by-value, by default?

Short example:

#include <iostream>

int main()
{
    int n;
    [&](){n = 10;}();             // OK
    [=]() mutable {n = 20;}();    // OK
    // [=](){n = 10;}();          // Error: a by-value capture cannot be modified in a non-mutable lambda
    std::cout << n << "\n";       // "10"
}

The question: Why do we need the mutable keyword? It's quite different from traditional parameter passing to named functions. What's the rationale behind?

I was under the impression that the whole point of capture-by-value is to allow the user to change the temporary -- otherwise I'm almost always better off using capture-by-reference, aren't I?

Any enlightenments?

(I'm using MSVC2010 by the way. AFAIK this should be standard)

Quick Q: Where do I have to write 'template' and 'typename'? -- StackOverflow

By Blog Staff | Aug 4, 2013 09:19 PM | Tags: intermediate

This question is an oldie but goodie. Note that in C++11 some of this becomes clearer, because it's now recommended to use constexpr and using template aliases instead of "traits" styles, and traits are one of the bigger (but not only) reasons to have a template refer to another template.

Where and why do I have to put the “template” and “typename” keywords?

In templates, where and why do I have to put typename and template on dependent names? What exactly are dependent names anyway? I have the following code: ...

Contextually Converted to Bool -- Chris Sharpe

By Blog Staff | Jul 31, 2013 09:03 AM | Tags: intermediate

A nice writeup of when this "it just works the way you expect" feature kicks in:

Contextually converted to bool

by Chris Sharpe

From the article:

Something I found mildly surprising about C++11 is that this works:

#include <iostream>

struct Testable
{
    explicit operator bool() const { return true; }
};

int main()
{
    Testable t;
    if (t)
        std::cout << "Converted to true!\n";
}

That is, it compiles and prints Converted to true!.

The new bit here is the explicit keyword. When I first saw an example like this, I expected to have to write

if (bool( t )) // ...

[...]

Boost Your Productivity with C++11 and Templates (Sep 9-13, Oct 7-11) -- Peter Gottschling

By Blog Staff | Jul 29, 2013 05:11 AM | Tags: intermediate

peter-gottschling.jpgThis course is being held in English and German:

Boost Your Productivity with C++11 and Templates

by Peter Gottschling

  • September 9-13 (German)
  • October 7-11 (English)

Abstract:

Templates (generic programming)

  • Function templates
  • Class templates
  • Variadic Templates (C++11)
  • Concepts
  • Specialization
  • Template arguments that are not types
  • Functors
  • Lambda functions (C++11)

Standard Template Library

  • Iterator concept
  • Containers
  • Functions
  • Meta-programming
  • Let the compiler compute
  • Providing type informations
  • Auto and decltype (C++11)
  • Const-adaptive classes
  • Expression templates

Other advanced and new techniques

  • Calling functions from derived classes without overhead
  • RValues and move semantics (C++11)
  • Initialization lists (C++11)
  • New for-loops (C++11)

Peter Gottschling is author of the Matrix Template Library 4, co-author of the Boost Graph Library and other scientific libraries. He is vice-chair of DIN's programming language group and head of the German delegation in the ISO committee for C++ standardization. He is managing director of SimuNova and taught C++ at TU Dresden, TU Berlin and Indiana University.