Clang/LLVM Conference videos and slides are now available

By Blog Staff | May 6, 2013 04:43 PM | Tags: advanced

The recent 2013 European Clang/LLVM developer meeting talk videos and/or slides are now available here.

Here are a few of the talks of interest to C++ developers. All have videos available except the last. Check out the page for details and a full talk list.

Keynotes

Optimization in LLVM - Numbers, A Case Study, and Looking Forward
Chandler Carruth (Google)

Talks

clang-format - Automatic formatting for C++
Daniel Jasper (Google)

Performing Source-to-Source Transformations with Clang
Olaf Krzikalla (TU Dresden)

Run-time tracking of uninitialized data with MemorySanitizer
Evgeniy Stepanov (Google)

LLVM on IBM POWER processors: a progress report
Ulrich Weigand (IBM)

Tutorials

How to implement an LLVM Assembler
Simon Cook (Embecosm)

The Clang AST (slides only)
Manuel Klimek (Google)

For more talks, and video/slide links, head over to the site.

Quick Q: static constexpr variable vs. constexpr function? -- StackOverflow

By Blog Staff | May 1, 2013 04:39 PM | Tags: intermediate basics

With a nice Quick A by Morwenn that not only gives the right answer as of today, but is current with a feature voted into C++14 just two weeks ago that lets you drop the ()'s:

static constexpr variable vs. function

Is there a difference between declaring floating point constant as a static constexpr variable and a function as in example below, or is it just a matter of style?

class MY_PI
{
public:
    static constexpr float MY_PI_VAR = 3.14f;
    static constexpr float MY_PI_FUN() { return 3.14f; }
}

Functional Patterns in C++ -- Bartosz Milewski

By Blog Staff | May 1, 2013 12:11 PM | Tags: advanced

If you're familiar with functional language styles and you want an advanced look at how your favorite functional styles are supported in modern C++, with a dash of Haskell, check out these three videos by Bartosz Milewski:

Functional Patterns in C++ (slides)

by Bartosz Milewski

Part 1, Functors: First the introduction to some common functional patterns like Functor, which, surprisingly pops up everywhere. I'll show the example of a unique_ptr and a vector as Functors. Of course, this is only in preparation for asynchronous functors.

Part 2, Currying, Applicative: A little digression to Haskell and the Maybe functor and the explanation of currying. Then I'll show you the Applicative Functor pattern. This is, of course, in preparation for for the asynchronous applicative functor pattern.

Part 3, Asynchronous API, Monoid, Monad: The encapsulation of asynchronous API that doesn't lead to inversion of control and spaghetti code. Very natural example of a Monad Pattern.

Slides (parts 1-3)

Interestingly, Bartosz' talk ends with a plea for (essentially) future.then and a C#-style await... both of which are under active consideration in the C++ standards committee as part of a potential near-term C++ technical specification on concurrency and parallelism.

Advanced Developer Conference C++

By MichaelWong | Apr 30, 2013 11:45 AM | Tags: None

There's still time to go to:

Advanced Developers C++ 2013

May 7-8, 2013

Bad Aibling, Germany

Sessions are presented in either English or German. While the conference has many Windows-focused topics, a number of the sessions are of general interest to C++ developers.

Here are highlights from the Sessions page:

Trends and Future of C++ Standard and ISOCPP.org
Transactional Memory in C++
Michael Wong, IBM, and subgroup chair of ISO C++ SG5 (Transactional Memory)

Keynote: Building Modern Device Apps with C++ 
Building and Consuming Cloud Services with C++
Steve Teixeira, Microsoft

Warum wird Code so wie er ist? [Why does code get the way it does?]
Holger Kolb, DEVCOL

Einfacheres C++ mit C++11 [Simpler C++ with C++11]
Peter Sommerlad, FHO HSR Hochschule für Technik

Sicher sein oder sicher fühlen? -- Sicheren C++ Code schreiben [Be secure or feel secure? -- Writing secure C++ code]
Oliver Niehus, Microsoft

Performance-Optimierung für parallelen C++ Code auf Windows [Performance optimizing parallel C++ code on Windows]
Programmieren und Optimieren auf Xeon Phi [Programming and Optimizing for Xeon Phi]
Michael Steyer, Intel

Continue reading more sessions...

Trip Report: ISO C++ Spring 2013 Meeting, Part 3 -- Michael Wong

By Blog Staff | Apr 30, 2013 07:38 AM | Tags: None

Part 3 of Michael Wong's trip report:

The view from C++ Standard meeting April 2013 Part 3

by Michael Wong

In this series that looks at C++14 content, we looked at features from Language and Library for C++14. Now we will look at Concurrency which is the other group that contributed features for C++14. In reality, some of the features from Language and Library also came from Concurrency. ...

C++ on the Web: Run Your Big 3D Game in the Browser! -- Andre Weissflog

By Blog Staff | Apr 26, 2013 02:37 PM | Tags: intermediate

Building C++ to target Javascript (e.g., asm.js) and execute C++ in the browser is becoming quite the popular indoor sport. Here's a current presentation and experience report:

C++ on the Web: Run your big 3D Game in the browser! (slides)

by Andre Weissflog
Head of Development, Berlin
Bigpoint GmbH

My presentation about porting large C/C++ code bases to the browser (emscripten, flascc, Google Native Client)

From the Wrap-up slide:

• You can run big C/C++ code bases ("a million lines of code") in the browser.
• Javascript is already fast enough for many types of games.
• Massive performance improvements happening right now (better code generation, JS engines better at running generated code, asm.js...)
• ...

Trip Report: ISO C++ Spring 2013 Meeting, Part 2 -- Michael Wong

By Blog Staff | Apr 26, 2013 01:21 PM | Tags: None

Part 2 of Michael Wong's trip report:

The view from C++ Standard meeting April 2013 Part 2

by Michael Wong

In part 1 of this trip report, I spoke about the general mood of the April C++ Std meeting in Bristol and the plan to release C++14 [Committee] Draft (CD) after the meeting. I also deep dived into the language feature set for C++14.

Now I will deep dive onto the library feature additions for C++14. As with the language features, some of these originated from other subgroups. As before, I will not talk about minor bug fixes, but also talk about proposals that did not pass as they are often the most controversial. ...

Trip Report: ISO C++ Spring 2013 Meeting -- Michael Wong

By Blog Staff | Apr 26, 2013 12:50 PM | Tags: None

A trip report from Michael Wong:

The view from C++ Standard meeting April 2013 Part 1

by Michael Wong

... Our goal was to triage all features that can enter C++14. This means C++14 is more than just bug fixes and is unlike a Technical Corrigendum like TC1 which bridged C++ 1998 to C++2003. As such it will have additional features beyond defect fixes that has been deemed to be small enough in scope and solution but significant enough in annoyance that it should be fixed immediately post C++11...

Here are the new language extensions voted in...

Quick Q: When should I use noexcept? -- StackOverflow

By Blog Staff | Apr 24, 2013 03:25 AM | Tags: basics

As C++11-compliant compilers start to roll out and be adopted, people want to know to best use new C++11 features, such as:

When Should I Really Use noexcept?

 

1. There are many examples of functions that I know will never throw, but for which the compiler cannot determine so on its own. Should I append noexcept to the function declaration in all such cases? ... For which situations should I be more careful about the use of noexcept, and for which situations can I get away with the implied noexcept(false)?
2. When can I realistically except to observe a performance improvement after using noexcept? ... Do modern compilers take advantage of noexcept in this way? If not, can I excect some of them to do so in the near future?

Thanks to our Bristol hosts!

By Herb Sutter | Apr 23, 2013 03:55 PM | Tags: None

I would like to personally thank (again) our hosts for last week's ISO C++ standards meeting in Bristol, notably Roger Orr and our U.K. national body host BSI, as well as the sponsors who supported the meeting financially and otherwise: ACCU, Google, Archer-Yates, Getco, Red Hat, and Gnu C++ User.

Our hosts and sponsors not only provided great facilities, but demonstrated grace under pressure when the registered attendee count rose beyond expectations weeks before the meeting, and then continued to rise, ending up far above recent attendance records. Our hosts rose to the occasion, providing meeting space for more national body experts and more subgroups meeting in parallel than we've seen for some 15 years. And they generously fed everyone lunch each day for six days, going well above and beyond expectations. (The hosts for the Chicago meeting this fall have taken notice and are preparing accordingly, and we appreciate their generosity as well.)

Aside: My trip report graph shows that there were 100 experts attending last week, but that's conservative. We had 102 pre-registered to attend, and it looks like the final count will be 107 at the meeting; I'm waiting for the confirmed number and will update that trip report when I get it. For comparison, up till 2011 the average meeting attendance was half that.

Thanks again, Roger and BSI and all of our meeting sponsors! It was a well-hosted, smoothly run, and very productive meeting. Thank you.