October 25, Pavia, Italy
November 6-8, Berlin, Germany
November 3-8, Kona, HI, USA
By Blog Staff | May 6, 2013 11:26 PM | Tags: intermediate basics
Head on over to the C/C++ Cafe for:
Introduction to the C++11 feature: extended friend declaration
by FangLu
Excerpt:
The extended
frienddeclaration feature is newly introduced in the C++11 standard. In this article, I will introduce this feature and provide some examples on how to use this feature.
Firstly, let's see why this feature is added into C++11. ...
By Blog Staff | May 6, 2013 06:46 PM | Tags: intermediate basics
Herb Sutter is resuming his Guru of the Week series of problem-and-solution articles about coding in C++, with the intent to gradually update the 88 existing issues and write a few more along the way.
The first problem was posted today:
GotW #1: Variable Initialization -- or Is It? (3/10)
by Herb Sutter
This first problem highlights the importance of understanding what you write. Here we have a few simple lines of code — most of which mean something different from all the others, even though the syntax varies only slightly.
The solution is coming "soon"...
By Blog Staff | May 6, 2013 04:43 PM | Tags: advanced
The recent 2013 European Clang/LLVM developer meeting talk videos and/or slides are now available here.
Here are a few of the talks of interest to C++ developers. All have videos available except the last. Check out the page for details and a full talk list.
Keynotes
Optimization in LLVM - Numbers, A Case Study, and Looking Forward
Chandler Carruth (Google)Talks
clang-format - Automatic formatting for C++
Daniel Jasper (Google)Performing Source-to-Source Transformations with Clang
Olaf Krzikalla (TU Dresden)Run-time tracking of uninitialized data with MemorySanitizer
Evgeniy Stepanov (Google)LLVM on IBM POWER processors: a progress report
Ulrich Weigand (IBM)Tutorials
How to implement an LLVM Assembler
Simon Cook (Embecosm)The Clang AST (slides only)
Manuel Klimek (Google)
For more talks, and video/slide links, head over to the site.
By Blog Staff | May 3, 2013 04:41 PM | Tags: basics
A short and basic summary of C++'s view of memory management: You can worry about it a lot less, and still be efficient, if you say who owns what.
Goodness in programming languages, part 4 -- Ownership & Memory
by Andy Balaam
From the post:
... over time the community of C++ programmers has been developing a new way of thinking about memory, and developing tools in the C++ language to make it easier to work in this way.
Modern C++ code rarely or never uses “delete” or “free” to deallocate memory, but instead defines clearly which object owns each other object. ...
By Blog Staff | May 2, 2013 01:13 PM | Tags: basics
How well do you know tie and ignore, especially to use the C++11 multiple return value idiom?
Please explain this code that uses std::ignore
I'm reading the documentation on
std::ignorefrom cppreference. I find it quite hard to grasp the true purpose of this object, and the example code doesn't do it much justice. For example, in the below code, how and why isinsertedset to true? It doesn't make much sense to me.#include <iostream> #include <string> #include <set> #include <tuple> int main() { std::set<std::string> set_of_str; bool inserted; std::tie(std::ignore, inserted) = set_of_str.insert("Test"); if (inserted) { std::cout << "Value was inserted sucessfully\n"; } }If someone can explain the code to me, it would be appreciated. Thanks.
By Blog Staff | May 2, 2013 11:16 AM | Tags: intermediate basics
Quick A: When it comes to destruction, only your deleter knows for sure... but he's captured at construction time, so all starts well and stays well.
Why do std::shared_ptr<void> work
I found some code using std::shared_ptr to perform arbitrary cleanup at shutdown. At first I thought this code could not possibly work, but then I tried the following:
[edited]
int main() { vector<shared_ptr<void>> v; { v.push_back( shared_ptr<test>( new test() ) ); } } // [[ how can this destroy type-safely? ]]
By Blog Staff | May 2, 2013 04:45 AM | Tags: basics
Quick A: No.
A simple but important question:
C++11 lambda capture semantics
When I use
[=]to indicate that I would like all local variables to be captured by value in a lambda, will that result in all local variables in the function being copied, or just all local variables that are used by the lambda?So, for example, if I have:
vector<int> my_huge_vector(100000); int my_measly_int; some_function([=](int i){ return my_measly_int + i; });Will
my_huge_vectorbe copied, even though I don't use it in the lambda?
By Blog Staff | May 1, 2013 04:39 PM | Tags: intermediate basics
With a nice Quick A by Morwenn that not only gives the right answer as of today, but is current with a feature voted into C++14 just two weeks ago that lets you drop the ()'s:
static constexpr variable vs. function
Is there a difference between declaring floating point constant as a
static constexprvariable and a function as in example below, or is it just a matter of style?class MY_PI { public: static constexpr float MY_PI_VAR = 3.14f; static constexpr float MY_PI_FUN() { return 3.14f; } }
By Blog Staff | May 1, 2013 12:11 PM | Tags: advanced
If you're familiar with functional language styles and you want an advanced look at how your favorite functional styles are supported in modern C++, with a dash of Haskell, check out these three videos by Bartosz Milewski:
Functional Patterns in C++ (slides)
by Bartosz Milewski
Part 1, Functors: First the introduction to some common functional patterns like Functor, which, surprisingly pops up everywhere. I'll show the example of a
unique_ptrand avectoras Functors. Of course, this is only in preparation for asynchronous functors.Part 2, Currying, Applicative: A little digression to Haskell and the Maybe functor and the explanation of currying. Then I'll show you the Applicative Functor pattern. This is, of course, in preparation for for the asynchronous applicative functor pattern.
Part 3, Asynchronous API, Monoid, Monad: The encapsulation of asynchronous API that doesn't lead to inversion of control and spaghetti code. Very natural example of a Monad Pattern.
Interestingly, Bartosz' talk ends with a plea for (essentially) future.then and a C#-style await... both of which are under active consideration in the C++ standards committee as part of a potential near-term C++ technical specification on concurrency and parallelism.
By MichaelWong | Apr 30, 2013 11:45 AM | Tags: None
There's still time to go to:
Advanced Developers C++ 2013
May 7-8, 2013
Bad Aibling, Germany
Sessions are presented in either English or German. While the conference has many Windows-focused topics, a number of the sessions are of general interest to C++ developers.
Here are highlights from the Sessions page:
Trends and Future of C++ Standard and ISOCPP.org
Transactional Memory in C++
Michael Wong, IBM, and subgroup chair of ISO C++ SG5 (Transactional Memory)Keynote: Building Modern Device Apps with C++
Building and Consuming Cloud Services with C++
Steve Teixeira, MicrosoftWarum wird Code so wie er ist? [Why does code get the way it does?]
Holger Kolb, DEVCOLEinfacheres C++ mit C++11 [Simpler C++ with C++11]
Peter Sommerlad, FHO HSR Hochschule für TechnikSicher sein oder sicher fühlen? -- Sicheren C++ Code schreiben [Be secure or feel secure? -- Writing secure C++ code]
Oliver Niehus, MicrosoftPerformance-Optimierung für parallelen C++ Code auf Windows [Performance optimizing parallel C++ code on Windows]
Programmieren und Optimieren auf Xeon Phi [Programming and Optimizing for Xeon Phi]
Michael Steyer, Intel