The Bristol Papers and the State of C++

One observer's commentary on the standards meeting in process this week, based on the mailing papers and interviewing some delegates by telephone:

The Bristol Papers and the State of C++

[This is] a follow up on the series about the papers for the Bristol Meeting. I'll try to give a little look at C++14, it is slowly taking shape. But as the [Bristol standards] meeting is still going on, there are a lot of pending details missing to put up the facts for C++14. Maybe we have to wait till Chicago for C++14 clearly taking shape. Also I want to cover some of the feedback, and write a little bit about my own view on C++, now after reading all the papers.

Add a Comment

Comments are closed.

Comments (2)

0 2

NoSenseEtAl said on Apr 18, 2013 02:16 PM:

I one word: pathetic
Im a bit more words:
LOL, C# team produces more core language features in a weekend hackaton than ISO C++ committee can in 3 years.
Also *clap clap* for concepts getting another kill: first C++0x shipping date, now static if.
Cant wait to read : cure for cancer not accepted because it is not clear how it interferes with concepts(that arent ready just yet).
1 0

FaTony said on Apr 19, 2013 04:55 PM:

C# team can produce whatever they want, but they won't get an international standard. Remember, only C# 2.0 (2006) is standardized. And have you seen a diverse C# implementations on many platforms? Right.

Static_if was killed because it would've hurt the language in the long term. ++Bjarne.